Rebus Searches Charlie’s Home and Finds Ronnie’s Camera
Hide and SeekJohn Rebus Searches Charlie’s Home and Finds Ronnie’s Camera is a turning point in the inquiry: a search of Charlie’s cramped room uncovers a camera that Tracy recognizes as Ronnie McGrath’s. The discovery places an important object in Charlie’s surroundings, while the circumstances of the search reveal that Tracy had sought him out over Ronnie’s death and had left their meeting hurt and distressed. Rebus’s response is both investigative and protective: he secures the camera without disturbing possible fingerprints and sends Tracy to the station with officers.
The confrontation that brings Rebus there
Tracy appears at the door as Rebus is about to leave. She has been crying, and one eye is visibly bruised. Rather than seeming surprised to find him, she appears relieved and embraces him. Rebus returns the embrace awkwardly and lightly, then keeps hold of her arms as she tries to regain her composure. The officers nearby pretend not to notice. This moment of contact gives way to the practical business of the investigation when Tony McCall arrives and sees them together.
Asked how she came to be there, Tracy explains that she has only just managed to find Charlie, who moves around frequently. She had wanted to talk to someone about Ronnie. The conversation with Charlie turned into an argument after he blamed her for Ronnie’s death, saying that she should have looked after Ronnie, stopped him taking drugs, or got him away from Pilmuir. Tracy rejects the idea that she could have controlled Ronnie: she believed he knew what he was doing, and he would not have listened to her. Her account makes the conflict personal, but it also clarifies what brought her to Charlie: she was seeking someone connected to Ronnie, not setting out to start a fight.
Rebus carefully establishes the sequence. Charlie began shouting, Tracy shouted back, and Charlie hit her; she confirms this. When Rebus asks whether she hit him in return, the exchange suggests that the confrontation may have involved more than one act of aggression, but the scene does not establish further details. The distinction matters to Rebus’s questioning: he seeks a clear account without treating Charlie’s accusation about Ronnie as proof that Tracy caused his death.
From testimony to a search
McCall moves through the room, checking cushions, old magazines, and sleeping bags. He finds a small polythene bag and picks it up; Tracy says she knows nothing about it. Rebus says that they believe her, then asks whether Charlie ran away. Tracy confirms that he left through the back door while the constables came to the other entrance. The bag is a separate find from the camera: it contributes to the suspicion surrounding the premises, but it does not explain why Ronnie’s camera is there.
With Charlie gone, Rebus suggests that they inspect his room. It is spare in its furnishings: a sleeping bag, a desk, and an anglepoise lamp. Books, including many overdue library books, are stacked in precarious columns against the walls, nearly reaching the ceiling. This crowded, makeshift arrangement is a concrete portrait of Charlie’s space, but the search’s decisive evidence comes from a different part of the room.
McCall empties a large supermarket carrier bag onto the floor. Among its miscellaneous contents are pens, toy cars, cigarette papers, a wooden egg, a spool of cotton, a personal cassette player, a Swiss army knife, and a camera. He notices that the camera is a good-quality thirty-five-millimetre SLR and passes it to Rebus. Rebus first takes out a handkerchief and uses it to handle the camera, avoiding direct contact with an object that may carry prints. The method gives the discovery an evidentiary consequence: it is not merely recognized, but preserved for examination.
Identification and immediate consequences
Tracy is standing by the door with her arms folded. When Rebus turns to her, she confirms that the camera belongs to Ronnie. Her identification changes the meaning of an otherwise mixed collection of belongings. The camera is no longer just one item among the carrier bag’s odds and ends; it is a connection between Charlie’s room and the dead man at the center of the inquiry. The scene does not itself explain how the camera reached Charlie or what he intended to do with it, so the discovery raises questions rather than settling them.
The camera also resonates with the earlier inspection of Ronnie’s room, where Rebus saw original photographs pinned to the wall: images of Edinburgh Castle in different weather and photographs of a grinning young woman. Later, a photograph of the Castle in mist is recognized as closely resembling one associated with Ronnie’s room. These details establish photography as part of the investigation’s trail, but they do not prove that the camera found in Charlie’s room took any particular photograph. The distinction between an identified object and an unproven link keeps the clue open for further inquiry.
The camera’s relevance becomes sharper when Tracy later writes that the woman who attacked her at the University of Edinburgh library was the same girl shown in a nude photograph Brian Holmes had carried in his briefcase. Her account connects an image to Tracy, Brian Holmes, and the library incident, extending the novel’s chain of photographic evidence. It does not, by itself, establish that the camera found in Charlie’s room produced that image. Rather, the discovery sits within a plot where photographs can identify people and connect otherwise separate events.
Rebus orders a constable to take Tracy to Great London Road Police Station, explaining that it is for her protection. She appears ready to object, then accepts and leaves with the officers. Rebus remains to continue the search, but he considers the two finds—the small bag and Ronnie’s camera—enough to proceed on. The outcome is therefore twofold: the camera becomes a secured clue, and Tracy is removed from the exposed setting of the confrontation while Rebus continues investigating Charlie’s connection to Ronnie.